Incompetence is not a bug, it's a feature
Friday, September 23, 2011
Dead federal retirees paid $120 million yearly, report says - The Federal Eye - The Washington Post.
Just to hammer home my point that it's not the character or intelligence of public sector employees that - for the most part - I question. It's the whole concept of big government itself and all the Milton Friedman Category IV spending it involves. The good old US of A is (of course) no better in this respect - for all its entrenched religiosity and superior financial education;
I do not seek to detract from the son's crime. The government might have sent him the cheques in error, but he cashed them in sin. But seriously. If it were your money, would you have kept paying without ever checking?
Of course, if you are an American taxpayer, it was your money and (by the agency of your public servants) you did. Just like British taxpayers bought six billion pounds' worth of military equipment which our public servants (at best) lost, (at worst) sold to the enemy or (most likely) some combination of the two.
I am sorry, but this kind of thing is not a glitch to be ironed out in the model. It is the model. Big government trashes lives by locking good people into unproductive work financed by extortion from the productive work of others. How many decades of this nonsense will it take before belief in the intrinsic moral superiority of government action dies?
I didn't say that incompetence was a good 'feature', but you are right (again). Sometimes our only hope is that our oppressors are too stupid to grind us down thoroughly.
Posted by: Tom | Monday, September 26, 2011 at 07:08 PM
A more interesting thought, but maybe not quite where you were going with the post...
do wonder if incompetence really is a feature... like in an actually desirable feature?
Why is it that lots of the scary anti freedom stuff like biomettic ID cards or a database of all children, that Labor in the UK wanted to bring in didn't happen?
Mostly thanks to incompetence it looks to me, computer ssytems that didn't works things like that. Silver linings.
Posted by: Moggsy | Monday, September 26, 2011 at 12:37 PM
Absolutely I do agree. But that makes for short less interesting comments from me ^_^
Posted by: Moggsy | Monday, September 26, 2011 at 08:11 AM
"How many decades of this nonsense will it take..."
So far, the answer is about five or six, depending on exactly when you started counting.
The final answer is of course unknown at this time.
I fear it may not be within our lifetimes, which is a depressing thought.
Posted by: Andrew Duffin | Saturday, September 24, 2011 at 03:44 PM