THE LAST DITCH An Englishman returned after twenty years abroad blogs about liberty in Britain
Does the internet show who we really are?
So much for free movement of goods and labour

An airship captain writes...

Lost generation | Andrew Hankinson | Money | The Observer.

Andrew Hankinson's article blends common sense, fantasy and bitterness. His central point is one I have often made myself; that the two post-war generations in Britain have been guilty - via an underfunded "national insurance" system - of time travel theft.

Baby boomers had free education, affordable houses, fat pensions, early retirement and second homes (150,000 at the last census), but when we got to the buffet table – oh look, a couple of manhandled sandwiches. We've been left with education on the never-never and a property ladder with rotten rungs. Our work ethic is slurred (sic) and our salaries are stagnant. Any hope of promotion is paralysed by the comatose grey ceiling clogging every hierarchy. Overtime is unpaid and pensions are miserly. And the financial system which made our parents rich has left us choosing between crap job or no job. It's like we've been handed the keys to the family castle only to discover the family sold it to Starbucks. And we're going to have to work there.

He has a point, but his feudal analogy is telling. He's been cheated of his inheritance and he's too gutted (or too proud) to build another. He certainly has no plan to prove to his own heirs that he's a better man. In his mind, his predecessors owed him a living; not just - as I would argue - a duty of care to restrict their public spending to what they raised in taxes. He bemoans what they did, not because it was morally wrong, but because - by being too greedy - they have denied him the chance to do likewise.

Britain's Welfare State has been a Ponzi Scheme since the start. For all the prudent language of "national insurance" and "stamps", it was always to be paid for by succeeding generations. There is a famous picture of the first beneficiary waving his pension book. He had paid just one weekly national insurance "stamp", and got the greatest deal in pensions history, but there were tens of millions like him, if not on quite that scale.

When the 1946 Labour Government came to power on promises of "cradle to grave" welfare, it found the Treasury bare. Britain had just fought a global war against fascism. There were factories to rebuild, industries to reconstruct. So did they delay the scheme? No. They sent (tellingly) that charlatan Maynard Keynes as their emissary to the despised capitalists of the United States. He negotiated huge loans to fund it all. So the man waving that first pension book would live not on Socialist prudence, but Yankee dollars. His grandchildren would service that debt for him, all unknowing. Everyone who proudly said "I paid my stamp" when drawing their benefits was both deceiving and deceived.

This being the Guardian however, while Hankinson makes the same lament, he puts a rather different spin on it;

A university-­educated man shouldn't experience this.

Quite so, old fruit. But then you are not exactly a rarity now are you? The "universities" of modern Britain churn out so many graduates that they command no premium. Dashed irritating, what?

I chased that job I wanted: working on Arena magazine (now defunct) in the dazzling capital.

Right. Not just "a magazine", but a specific and rather glamorous one. You spent your academic life dreaming of one job out of how many? What was Arena's total full-time staff? Its peak circulation was only 30,000. I am guessing maybe 20 writers, if that. While its founders were slowly going broke learning that it was doomed in the digital age, you never modified your plans? Why not go the whole hog and sign on as an unemployed airship captain?

Faced with the prospect of delivering pizzas, his snobbery resurfaces. You would think he was the son of a Duke;

I would have to work nights. My boss would be… not a graduate. I'd have to chat with other deliverers – is that the job title? – who stack deodorants and empty beer cans on their bookshelves rather than books. Who probably don't even have bookshelves. Who probably think a digestif is a biscuit. And then there's (sic) my friends: they'd show interest initially, but after four weeks, three months… What if they ordered pizza? And what if I were unable to claw my way back out of the social quicksand?

I feel so sorry for his dad, pictured alongside him on the Guardian website. His life seems also to have been no picnic, but as his son acknowledges incredulously, his instinct was always to work his way out of trouble;

I remember when his building business folded in the 1990s. He didn't sign on. He knew he was going to end up in a flat above a shop, but he stacked Thomson directories in the front garden and asked for help delivering them. I said no, because friends might see us schlepping up those long driveways.

There are many in "the lost generation" to pity, but this snobbish little toad is not amongst them. His dad may forgive him that long-ago hubris, but the fates never will. Of course, he came to the right newspaper to sing his plaintive hymn to entitlements lost, but surely any potential employers reading this junk have mentally blacklisted him?

Still, his education need not be wasted. Neither the honest work available nor an idle life on benefits will much occupy his university-educated brain. Perhaps he can try thinking about, not only what got him into this mess, but how to dig the next generation out of it. It fell to the 1946 voters to risk their lives and lose their loved ones fighting one form of statism. That wasn't fair either, but they found an admittedly defective way forward. Maybe he can do better?

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Trooper Thompson

I'd be inclined to cut him just a little slack, on the basis that, although he spoils it by wallowing in bitterness at the end, he does seem to be grasping at some truths.

He's kind of worked out he's been shafted, but not quite how or by whom. He is a product of state-school indoctrination, and state-run social engineering. The pieces of the puzzle he's lacking are those that the fabian control-freaks took out of the box and hid down the back of the sofa.

Yes, we all must take responsibility for ourselves, and this may finally sink in, but he's having to battle through some pretty heavy brain-washing.

Demetrius

Back in the mid 1980's it was becoming apparent that the figures did not add up. But nobody wanted to know. North Sea Oil and money laundering was going to keep the wagon rolling. So one generation persuaded the next that consumerism was good and debt loading better. Now the vultures have come home to roost.

Teedj

@Andrew Duffin:

I suppose your plan ends when the State, no longer needed because everyone is happy and healthy, just "withers away".

Well no, it is sort of an ongoing process, rather than a singular project.

Where have I heard that before?

Perhaps you read it on the back of a cereal box?

If our resources are taken away in taxes and wasted on pointless public sector non-jobs or global warming projects, how will we be more productive?

In pretty much the same way that people have been getting more productive over the last 60 years or so, and often with much higher rates of taxation.

If we all think we're entitled to well-paid clean-hands 9-5 jobs and won't do anything less, how will be more productive.

Because the trend over the last 60 years in this country has been towards indoor/clean hands/service economy jobs and away from outdoor/dirty hands/industrial economy jobs.

As to the "well-paid" bit I entirely agree incomes are generally too low. Perhaps the government should raise the minimum wage?

Andrew Duffin

Excellent post Mr. Paine.

@Tj-Place:

And I suppose your plan ends when the State, no longer needed because everyone is happy and healthy, just "withers away". Where have I heard that before?

"People in the future will be richer..." only if future generations are more productive than we are. If our resources are taken away in taxes and wasted on pointless public sector non-jobs or global warming projects, how will we be more productive? If we all think we're entitled to well-paid clean-hands 9-5 jobs and won't do anything less, how will be more productive.

Tj-place.blogspot.com

"Britain's Welfare State has been a Ponzi Scheme since the start. For all the prudent language of "national insurance" and "stamps", it was always to be paid for by succeeding generations."

That is rather the point though, is it not? The logic is:

1) Pre-1947 there were a load of people too poor to afford healthcare.

2) Poor, ill, ignorant people can't work as hard or as effectively as less poor, less ill, less ignorant people so economic efficiency is reduced.

3) If you have a healthier, better educated workforce your economy grows faster, and everyone gets richer.

4) As people get richer, you can tax them more and use the additional tax revenue raised to pay off the debt of the preceding generation.

5) So people end up richer, healthier, and less ignorant.

So your description of the welfare state as "time travel theft" is completely wrong. People in the future will be richer, so it makes sense to redistribute income from them to us, particularly if the money thus redistributed is spent on things that enhance economic growth - like education, healthcare etc.

Andrew Withers (LPUK)

As a fully paid up 'Baby Boomer' I never had anything 'handed' to me. I had opportunity, I was faced with a choice take the opportunity and work hard, or not take the opportunity and whine about how 'unfair' life is.

As a graduate and employing sixty people, I spent one Christmas Eve Afternoon, helping dig out a collapsed drainage ditch. At no point did I say I'm the boss and it should not happenen to a graduate !

This is just the mental demarcation fostered by 1970's Unions

john miller

I love the crazy mixed up world of Arthur
Brown - wait, no the Guardian, sorry.

"A university-­educated man shouldn't experience this". That works for the Guardianistas does it? If we substitute Eton or Westminster or Harrow for "university", does it sill work? And if not, tell me in words of one syllable (cos I never went to any of em, guv) why not?

Peter Whale

As a war baby I might not qualify for babyboomer but my free education stopped at 17 when I left Grammar school. The education was better because there was no television just radio and books. When nothing is expected but what you earn yourself it's amazing how you find work. He should stop wallowing in self pity stop moaning and just keep trying. After all, the state will keep him in the position he stagnates to unless he makes the difference.

john

Jeepers. This article is the most ridiculous thing I have read in a long time. Talk about a total lack of self-awareness.

One of my grandfathers studied architecture in Austria - he came from a family of wealthy industrialists - and after the Nazis chucked him out he worked as a schoolteacher then sold textiles. Made a fortune though. A grandmother spent every weekend at the opera, lived with maids...after she left the concentration camps she worked in a bakery for a while, then sold clothes at a market stall for thirty years. Actually she made a fortune as well due to hard work and a total lack of pride. I'm a highly specialised professional but what's my work history...hmm..started cleaning floors in a deli...moved up to cleaning toilets in a hospital...and if my current job folded I would go right back to cleaning those toilets. The funny thing is, some of the people I cleaned with were refugees themselves, in particular capitalists who had fled socialism in Chile. One of them had worked fifteen hours a day for a couple of decades and had bought two investment properties with the overtime payments. One thing university, sorry "university" doesn't teach you is common bloody sense.

Brian, follower of Deornoth

He's probably right, though. It's far better to whine than to work, given we have a government that rewards whining lavishly and punishes working ruthlessly.

The comments to this entry are closed.