Smoking doublethink
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
No smoking prison sparks drop in crime - Telegraph.
As Dick Puddlecote points out, the media can't have it both ways. If a smoking ban can reduce the number of people going to jail, it can also reduce the number going to the pub.
Personally, I give the story little credence. A smoking ban in prisons will only increase the price of snout. Illegal drugs are, after all, widely (if expensively) available inside. If there were truth in the story, however, it should (if any actual thought underlay their positions) present a dilemma for the left. If fear of tobacco deprivation were enough to deter criminals, why stop there? How about banning TV sets? Playstations? Or, for the white-collar criminals, The Guardian? It has to be worth thinking about.
Guardian readers may also like to note that the story suggests crime is a matter of choice. However sad their family or social circumstances; however severe their peer-pressure; however vulnerable the potential criminals may have been, it seems they could choose not to commit crime.
What a heartening thought for the New Year.
Surely white collar criminals would want the Daily Mail!
Posted by: Paul Garrard | Thursday, December 31, 2009 at 09:11 PM
Thanks for the link, Tom.
Agreed the story shows correlation, but the causation is debatable, which is why I was surprised at the certainty of the headlines when the MSM had been so coy over pub closures.
It's also odd how swiftly authorities are moving on banning smoking in prisons (this has been coming for the past couple of years) whilst stubbornly baulking at removal of the other comforts you mentioned.
It seems rather hypocritical but then when has such a thing shamed a politician of any hue?
Posted by: Dick Puddlecote | Wednesday, December 30, 2009 at 11:54 AM