Green talk but no green walk? | Ethical living | Guardian Unlimited Environment
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Link: Green talk but no green walk? | Ethical living | Guardian Unlimited Environment.I honestly think this is the best confession I have ever read in
Pravda The Grauniad. One of its writers effectively admits, without a flicker of embarrassment, that he thinks his readers' principles are often just for show.
"Hands up anyone who isn't a hypocrite. Come on, own up. Who out there actually lives by every one of the principles they profess to uphold?"
For the benefit of any passing Guardianistas, please consider that a principle you merely "profess" to uphold is more of an affectation, really. Still, it probably impresses your "right on" friends down at the wine bar every bit as much as a real principle, so don't worry.
On the other hand, if you would like to start living a principled life, perhaps you should use more intellectual rigour when forming your principles? You might consider only adopting those you are able to live up to? You might reflect on the notion that, in professing principles for others to adhere to, while failing to do so yourself, you are following in some fairly unsavoury footsteps.
Just a thought.
Yes, an interesting use of language in the quote. You either have a principle or you don't, agreed!
Posted by: Welshcakes Limoncello | Saturday, March 03, 2007 at 06:11 PM
The following quote surely takes the prize
It is fine for BBC Newsnight's "ethical man" to be a tongue-in-cheek reporter, but if it is the head of Greenpeace who is totally pure and virtuous, then that is seen as just annoying.
Waht does it mean? Is it more acceptable for the head of Greenpeace to be a hypocrite?
Posted by: JohnM | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 06:59 PM