Another conspiracy to pervert the course of justice?
Sunday, March 04, 2007
Link: News of the World - Online Edition.
I apologise to Guido for thinking his theory about the injuncted email contrived. It seems that police sources have alleged to the News of the World that Number 10 did leak the email itself, presumably so as to try to engineer a mistrial.
I am no expert on current criminal law, but it seems to me that if true this would, in itself, be another attempt to pervert the course of justice. It could form the basis of a completely separate charge.
The "cash for peerages" story is really now irrelevant. If, as some allege, the Prime Minister's team has destroyed evidence, lied to the police and now deliberately leaked an email to the press to compromise a criminal trial, these are much more serious offences. Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice carries a theoretical maximum sentence of life imprisonment, although 10 years has been the longest sentence to date.
Frankly, if the office of our head of Government had really been involved in such a crime (which I am reluctant to believe) it would be time for the judges to break that record. The culture of "spin" which has grown up around Tony Blair is utterly despicable. There is no question that he and his staff are habitual deceivers.
Let us hope that habit has not been carried over into the world of criminal justice.
H/T Dizzy Thinks
The plot has thickened so much it's started burning the bottom of the saucepan.
Posted by: Northwing | Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 10:41 PM
For me the injunction was the smoke, the question is now where is the fire ? It is simply apalling and squalid.
Posted by: GUTHRUM | Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 07:10 PM
...which I am reluctant to believe...
Reluctant to believe that Tony could be involved or that the office was?
Posted by: jameshigham | Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 03:46 PM
I must admit I wondered this when I saw it was the BBC who had the story. I mean come on folks its not like they have been a real news organisation for years. Most of the time they run with Government press handouts as stories and so would be a natural conduit for any "official" leaker.
Posted by: 1327 | Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 03:34 PM
I don't believe this story though; the NoW has a habit of making wild accusations it later pays for.
If it is true there would have to be a vote of confidence motion in the government.
Posted by: cityunslicker | Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 11:24 AM
You honestly couldn't make it up, no wonder people are switched off from politics. Now what's a nice man like you doing reading the NoW?
Posted by: Ellee | Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 09:24 AM